Development of information technology systems

Development of information technology systems


ABSTRACT
The central drawback in Cyber Ethics is: however does one establish moral standards in an exceedingly skilled field that's outlined by a speedily evolving technology wherever the results of the technology and therefore the impact of any moral standards can not be far-famed within the timeframe during which the
standards should be established? Stories play a awfully necessary role in addressing this issue. This chapter explores the role of stories in Cyber Ethics.
INTRODUCTION
Several years agone, i used to be teaching AN undergrad laptop accomplishment category and determined to liven up things up a little with a heated discussion on some current and relevant topic from the sphere of laptop ethics. i believed i might begin by asking if any of the scholars had “borrowed” software system to try to to the schoolwork assignments,

rather than visit the workplace, and, if so, did that create them thieves? Or, i might raise if privacy on the net was extremely all that necessary. After all, doesn’t privacy restrict the free flow of data and therefore represent a benign sort of censorship? once I offered these concepts to the category i used to be confronted with the same intellectual lethargy that you simply get once presenting a subject that the students have already determined is irrelevant  to their goals in life. I looked across the faces within the category with a mix of confusion and astonishment. Personally, i feel that discussions of this kind may be intellectually stimulating and difficult. They involve advanced problems, competitive  values, competing interests and infrequently times necessary however razor skinny distinctions. So, I asked the class why I had received such a lukewarm response to my suggestions. After the customary shuffling in their seats, avoidance of eye contact, and stalls that may allow somebody else to speak, a student offered the following insight—“Ethics are just a bunch of rules that tell you what not to do.” And therein lies a serious problem.

Shortly after that, I was attending a conference at the Computer Ethics Institute in Washington, D.C. and had an opportunity to see the “Ten Commandments of Computer Ethics.” All 10 statements were stated in the negative. Don’t do this. Don’t do that. Don’t do the next thing. The student was right. Computer
ethics really was just a bunch of rules that tell you what not to do. In fact, after reading over the “Ten Commandments,” I concluded that the most ethical thing I could do would be to get out of the computer field lest I transgress one of these

daunting rules. How did computer ethics ever get into this dismal state?
Certainly one of the reasons is that computer ethics (now Cyber Ethics) has been dominated by a collection of unchallenged claims prescribing ethical behavior, or at least behavior that is considered to be ethical by prominent voices in the field. we've all detected most of those claims: you need to not copy software system, you must not violate the privacy of people, you need to not use laptop technology to take advantage of employees, you need to not enable society to evolve into technological haves and have-nots, etc., etc. And these values area unit typically reinforced by empirical studies that show repeatedly that undergraduates, men and women and even professionals typically come back up short on moral behavior (Kreie & Cronan, 1998, 2000; previous, M. et al., 2002). the matter arises once
you challenge one among these claims and ask—why is repeating software system unethical?
Or why is it therefore necessary to guard privacy? the matter is that there looks to be very little important thought behind these positions.
While these and plenty of alternative similar problems area unit clearly necessary to each
computing professionals and laptop users, and area unit being mentioned at length
(usually from one side), i might argue that they're just samples of a far larger issue that's not being mentioned in any respect. I see the central drawback in Cyber Ethics to be the means that of determinative moral standards. explicit  a lot of clearly, the central drawback in Cyber Ethics is: however does one establish moral standards in an exceedingly skilled field that's outlined by a speedily evolving technology wherever the
consequences of the technology and therefore the impact of any moral standards cannot
be far-famed within the timeframe during which the standards should be established? Stories
play a awfully necessary role in addressing this issue. Specifically, stories give
a means of exploring moral problems that the total vary of consequences is
not presently far-famed. But, so as to justify this claim, quite little bit of clarification
is so as.
BACKGROUND
Share on Google Plus

About time frenchtimes TV

    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments:

Post a Comment